Recently, about a week ago now, I noticed a new holiday
on the calendar. On the anniversary of the day when one airliner
crashed into a field in rural Pennsylvania, another flown into The
Pentagon in Washington DC, and two more airliners were flown into the
two tall towers of the World Trade Center in New York City, there is
now a holiday? This new holiday is meant to commemorate the loss of
almost 3,000 lives at the hands of 19 terrorists. It seems that
someone convinced plenty of people that this was a good idea. So, now
we have a holiday to commemorate the victims of the terrorist attacks
on America. That seems okay, maybe fair enough. Any guesses, though,
as to what this holiday is called? It's apparently “Patriot Day”.
It struck me quickly that there was something wrong with this
holiday. I can, in fact think of a few things. Not problems
necessarily with having a day on the anniversary to remember the
victims of the terrorist attacks, but rather with that particular
holiday. What kind of a holiday is a “Patriot Day”?
This new holiday was passed by a vote 407 in favor to
none opposed, as US House of Representatives Joint Resolution 71 on
25th October, 2001. The legal basis of this holiday is
laws 107-89 and 111-13 of US Federal law. Under Bush, at first, the
holiday was called “Prayer and Remembrance for the Victims of the
Terrorist Attacks on September 11th, 2001”. President
Barack Obama, on 10th September, 2012 proclaimed the
holiday is renamed “Patriot Day and National Day of Service and
Remembrance”. Though this is still cumbersome, it is at least
somewhat improved. But, the best improvement was the removal of the
word “prayer”, thus diminishing the holiday's violation of the
Establishment Clause of the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
“Prayer” in the name was a de-facto government endorsement of
religion, at least in general. There are, still, several points that
I take issue with. First, I want to look at what is a “patriot”
realistically. Does a real patriot need to constantly defend him or
her self against accusations of not appreciating his/her nation? As
if it's reasonable to jump to the conclusion that one is not a
patriot unless he or she says “I'm a patriot”. I would think that
the vast majority of Americans, even resident aliens, are generally
patriotic. I suspect, further, that that is true for most nations.
I'd think that most Brits are patriotic to Britain, and most Japanese
people are patriotic to Japan, for example. But, perhaps this concept
is lost on many of the loudest so-called “patriots”.
But, there are more points to contend. Like the issue of
redundancy. There is the issue of the fact that a “Patriot's Day”
seems like it might, in America, be one of a few holidays that
already exist. Independence Day – the “Fourth of July” to those
more vociferous of “patriots” – immediately comes to mind. Then
there is also the opportunity for patriotic display on Veteran's Day,
when we celebrate veterans of our armed forces and we say “thank
you for your service to our nation and defending our freedoms”.
Of-course another chance to tout one's patriotism is Memorial Day,
when we are supposed to remember and appreciate all those who gave
their lives to defend our nation. The war dead. It seems that there
is a certain palette in America, which just can't get enough of faux
patriotism. They have a taste for the tasteless. They're the ones,
you know, who just love soaring eagles painted with the Stars and
Stripes, over a “battlefield cross” – the rifle stuck in the
ground with a helmet on top – and “God Bless, godity-god-god-god”
printed over all things American.
Perhaps we could even have a “Terrorism Defiance Day”
on the 12th of September? After-all, that would certainly
be more fitting to the memory and honor of the victims of the
terrorists than any pseudo-patriotism holiday. We ought to stand up
to tell Muslim extremists, Islamists and religious bigots and
terrorists worldwide that we will not cower. That they will never
win. That we will always defy them and their malicious bullying. And
this is more appropriate considering that again they have attacked
the civilized world. On the 12th of September this year,
2012, we learned that terrorists staged an attack on US embassies in
Cairo, Egypt and Benghazi, Libya, even killing the US ambassador to
Libya and several other Americans. This violent assault on humanity
and civilization was done under the pretense of “offense”, as if
the exercise of freedom were a valid reason to justify murder. These
barbarian Islamists must be defied. They must eventually learn that
their efforts to dominate the globe and to destroy civilization and
humanity are futile.
Now,
I also think if there is to be a holiday for the events of September
11th,
then perhaps it should be a “Remembrance Day” instead. It would
be fair to say “let us remember all those whose lives were taken by
Islamist terrorists.” Almost three thousand lives were taken and
6,000 more were injured by suicide terrorist attacks on the 11th
of September, 2001, on United States soil, but they were not all
Americans. In fact, many of the victims were from many other nations.
Remember, it was the called the “World Trade Center” for a
reason. Additionally, in 2005, there was the 7th
of July attacks in London on Underground trains, which was also
terrorism. 700 people were wounded and 52 were killed. And, there was
the attacks in Madrid, Spain on the 11th
of March 2004, in which 191 people were murdered and 1,800 other
people were injured. Clearly, the issue is not about America. It's
the violent Islamist terrorists against the rest of the world. It's
about their terrorism and violence. “Patriot Day” is simply
invalid and inappropriate, but a “Remembrance Day” would be valid
and much more appropriate. Indeed, such a Remembrance Day should be
international. And, we should include on Remembrance Day, all the
victims in London, Madrid and many other places in addition to those
in New York, Pennsylvania and Washington DC.
I'm also a bit concerned with this patriotism bragging
nonsense. “Patriotism” is cheapened severely by the readiness
with which it is thrown around. Everything becomes an excuse to say
“I'm a patriot” for those who are all to easily moved by their
emotions. These people who cry “patriotism” so frequently and so
needlessly are themselves exploited by those who would use them
against themselves. Actual patriotism is not flying a flag, or
posting a picture on one's page on a website. Real patriotism is not
about incessantly announcing one's church membership or attempting to
impose one's twisted religious beliefs on everyone else. Though those
who mostly loudly tout their supposed “patriotism” tend act as
though that is the case. In fact, they often are only using term to
apply pressure on others to accept their beliefs. This makes the word
become toxic. They are, as a matter of fact, disrespecting those who
are serving their nation. They are making the very idea of a “Patriot
Day” repulsive. As if simply supporting and defending one's nation
is not their kind of patriotism. Real patriots do not need another
day for deliberately displaying pseudo-patriotism. A Remembrance Day
is far more appropriate.
Copyright
©
2012, Joshua Michail
I agree with your sentiment, Joshua. The idea that one's devotion to our country should be proven by an observance of this nature only cheapens the true sentiment involved. Why not choose to remember these tragic events for why they really represent: A shocking (and still controversial) example of how our government's complacency and incompetence can have far-reaching and insidious effects inflicted in the name of 'national security' Pearl Harbor Day spawned a legitimate war effort. September 11th has only deepened our everyday constant fear fear of threats unknown and hiding in the shadows everywhere.
ReplyDeleteI agree. While the conspiracy-nutters who say it was an "inside job" are completely off base, there is a slight bit to it. Apparently, Clinton left a document for Bush called "Al Qaeda Determined To Strike In The USA". The document explained the intelligence community's assessment that the terrorist organization was intent on attacking us on our soil. Terrorists had already made attacks on our ships and on our embassies in the middle east. But, they couldn't, and did not, know when, where in the US, or how the attack would come. Still, Bush, in all his partisan arrogance, did choose to ignore the document. The conspiracists refuse to understand the difference between an "inside job" and dropping the ball.
DeleteBut, what annoys me more than the conspiracy-nutters is the saccharine pseudo-patriotic know-nothings.